What is this word Love of which the meaning has been twisted forever?
It seems we never truly love someone eventhough we are intimated with someone physically, and also we never love other people or any living being.
Possession is not love. We cannot not possess anyone. The thinking that we can belong to someone is false. Nothing can be belonged to. They just exist there.
Love is not "seperative" between mine and yours (Does love mean loving one but not another?).
Love is not between two images, having images about someone. If it is so, we suffer when we loose someone because their images are no longer with us.
Love is not based on pleasures, if it is so, when we loose someone, we suffer because we instinctively feel that they no longer give pleasures to us.
Love being connected with the immeasurable energy, having mutual intense energy. Being connected with someone that way brings freedom from inner confinement and therefore generate the inner intense feeling of love that is cannot be described. It's a real freedom with no contamination of inner suffering and conflict.
Love is not possession, not seperative, not image-based and not based one pleasures, but rather a quality and energy of intense passion.
Also, love and compassion are the same. To love is to naturally care and to give without wanting anything for oneself.
When we love - and not the meaning of love that most people automatically feel or define - we are free and we are compassionate to all living beings. We can be with someone but we don't have to possess. We can have intimacy and at the same time love passionately.
Showing posts with label real love. Show all posts
Showing posts with label real love. Show all posts
03 April 2014
27 December 2013
That deep connection with no lovely someone
I was thinking, "What If..."What if a human being knows how to connect with lives around but can never meet the other human they are deeply-connected to be with? Talking everyday about the world we live in, having hugs with deep love connection, waking up everyday and find them by your side knowing Real love is flowering everyday. How about we compare us to other animals (Note: We are animals too - There are "human" and "nonhuman" animals).
Animals are jealous but we don't have to be jealous. Animals are cruel to each others but we don't have to be cruel. Animals are sexual but we don't have to be sexual (we are more sexual than them but we can be less or not at all - not at all means being sexually with no true meaning - Wait! I'm not meaning you have to be against sex. Sex can be a channel of pleasurable release if done without lust, and more importantly if you have sex with deep real love, you are free). These are a few examples of the comparison.
The point of comparison is this question...What are the things that human animal has that nonhuman animal doesn't have? I'm sure it's non-insecurity and deep-love connection to all lives.
So, to reflect my first paragraph, if we already have deep connection, do we have to attach to some particular one our whole life? My answer would be it is Wonderful to be with someone that we deeply connect with. However, it must be real "deep connection" (no false attachment because that is not deep connection which is love).
But if we can never ever be with that someone? Should we be in sorrow? I would be sad myself but if that deep connection is only physical touch that happens with spiritual love, then spiritually connecting with other people without the touch is the same. And being in in tune and having the same energy with the people who share your view of life with is one of the best presents you can ever have. I'm sure most of us are still sad without that true connection with someone particular, I am myself. But there is always the brighter side if you are in love with life and inner connection you have with all lives, especially if you have friends you have common spiritual views with. Look within.
Animals are jealous but we don't have to be jealous. Animals are cruel to each others but we don't have to be cruel. Animals are sexual but we don't have to be sexual (we are more sexual than them but we can be less or not at all - not at all means being sexually with no true meaning - Wait! I'm not meaning you have to be against sex. Sex can be a channel of pleasurable release if done without lust, and more importantly if you have sex with deep real love, you are free). These are a few examples of the comparison.
The point of comparison is this question...What are the things that human animal has that nonhuman animal doesn't have? I'm sure it's non-insecurity and deep-love connection to all lives.
So, to reflect my first paragraph, if we already have deep connection, do we have to attach to some particular one our whole life? My answer would be it is Wonderful to be with someone that we deeply connect with. However, it must be real "deep connection" (no false attachment because that is not deep connection which is love).
But if we can never ever be with that someone? Should we be in sorrow? I would be sad myself but if that deep connection is only physical touch that happens with spiritual love, then spiritually connecting with other people without the touch is the same. And being in in tune and having the same energy with the people who share your view of life with is one of the best presents you can ever have. I'm sure most of us are still sad without that true connection with someone particular, I am myself. But there is always the brighter side if you are in love with life and inner connection you have with all lives, especially if you have friends you have common spiritual views with. Look within.
08 September 2013
To love is to be passionate
What is this word Love of which the meaning has been twisted for ages?
Does love mean lustful sexuality and being belonged by and belonging someone?
We all feel we have to be possessed and possessing a person when the truth is that love is a beautiful positive energy rather than possession. And we all feel that "seperative love" between "mine" and "yours" (Does love mean loving one but not another?). For this, we can see that we never truly love that someone eventhough we are intimated with that someone physically and with false attachment, and also we never love other people or any living being because we possess and are seperative.
Love is love. Possession is not love. Possession means wanting someone and the things that we like about him/her for oneself, having images about him/her. Love is not between two images but is being connected with the immeasurable energy, having mutual intense energy. Being connected with someone that way brings freedom from inner confinement and therefore generate the inner intense feeling of love that cannot be described. It's a real freedom with no contamination of inner suffering and conflict.
When we do not love, we suffer from our attachment that they "belong to us" which is a false thing - Because nothing can be belonged to - They just exist there. And when we do not love, we suffer when we loose someone because we think that they are ours and we instinctively feel that they no longer give pleasures to us and that their images are no longer with us.
Love is not possession, but rather a quality and energy of intense passion.
Also, love and compassion are the same. To love is to naturally care and to give without wanting anything for oneself.
When we do not possess, we love, which is not the meaning of love that most people automatically feel or define. We can be with someone but we don't have to possess. We can have intimacy and at the same time love passionately.
Does love mean lustful sexuality and being belonged by and belonging someone?
We all feel we have to be possessed and possessing a person when the truth is that love is a beautiful positive energy rather than possession. And we all feel that "seperative love" between "mine" and "yours" (Does love mean loving one but not another?). For this, we can see that we never truly love that someone eventhough we are intimated with that someone physically and with false attachment, and also we never love other people or any living being because we possess and are seperative.
Love is love. Possession is not love. Possession means wanting someone and the things that we like about him/her for oneself, having images about him/her. Love is not between two images but is being connected with the immeasurable energy, having mutual intense energy. Being connected with someone that way brings freedom from inner confinement and therefore generate the inner intense feeling of love that cannot be described. It's a real freedom with no contamination of inner suffering and conflict.
When we do not love, we suffer from our attachment that they "belong to us" which is a false thing - Because nothing can be belonged to - They just exist there. And when we do not love, we suffer when we loose someone because we think that they are ours and we instinctively feel that they no longer give pleasures to us and that their images are no longer with us.
Love is not possession, but rather a quality and energy of intense passion.
Also, love and compassion are the same. To love is to naturally care and to give without wanting anything for oneself.
When we do not possess, we love, which is not the meaning of love that most people automatically feel or define. We can be with someone but we don't have to possess. We can have intimacy and at the same time love passionately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
